Quantitation of serum NtAb titers in plasma from convalescent COVID-19 individuals is recommended for optimal selection of specimens for passive transfer therapies; the FDA recommends the use of plasma with NtAb50 levels ?1/160 [22]. and a value 0.05 is considered statistically significant. The analyses were performed using SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Kinetics of antibody titers/levels were classified as ascendant (an increase of antibody levels >?10% compared to previous sampling point), descendant (any decrease), fluctuating, or constant. Results Patients characteristics All 51 individuals presented with pneumonia and imaging or laboratory findings compatible with COVID-19 and were hospitalized in either the pneumology ward (n?=?27) or the intensive care unit (ICU; n?=?24). As demonstrated in Table ?Table1,1, most patients (69%) experienced one or more comorbidities and displayed high serum levels of several pro-inflammatory biomarkers at the time of serological testing. Four ICU individuals eventually died. Specificity of NtAb and SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassays Out of the 20 control sera, none of them returned positive results by any of the immunoassays used in the study. Therefore, the specificity of CLIA and the NtAb assays was 100% (95% CI, 83.9C100%). Agreement between NtAb and SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassays results Qualitative results returned by immunoassays were evaluated either considering the entire dataset or grouping sera according to the time of sampling after the onset of symptoms (15?days or ?15?days) (Table ?(Table2).2). As demonstrated in Table ?Table3,3, overall, results provided by the COVID-19 ELISA IgG test best matched those acquired with the NtAb assay (, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63C1), followed by those of the Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA (, 0.52; 0.52; 95% CI, 0.22C0.81), LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.2C0.78), and MAGLUMI 2019-nCoV IgG (0.4; 95% CI, 0.2C0.77). The same pattern was observed when sera collected either 15?days or ?15?days after the onset of symptoms were analyzed separately. Notably, the concordance between results returned from the NtAb assay and the COVID-19 ELISA IgG was 100% for sera acquired at ?15?days following symptom onset. Table 2 Performance of an antibody neutralization method using a reporter-based pseudotyped computer virus (vesicular stomatitis computer virus pseudotyped with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein) and four commercial SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassays for the analysis of COVID-19
Qualitative results/time of sampling after the onset of symptomsa
Antibody assay
GFP-VSV-SARS-CoV-2 S pseudotype NtAb test
Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA
LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG
MAGLUMI 2019-nCoV IgG
COVID-19 ELISA IgG
Positive (all sera)8376757783Negative (all sera)71415137Positive/15?days3731303137Negative/15?days41011104Positive/?15?days4645454646Negative/?15?days34433 Open in a separate window aA total of 90 sera were included, of which 41 were collected 15?days after the onset of symptoms and 49 afterwards (?15?days) Table 3 Agreement between the results of a reporter-based pseudotyped computer virus antibody neutralization method (vesicular stomatitis computer virus pseudotyped with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein) and four commercial SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassays
Paired results (NtAb assay/commercial immunoassay)
Commercial immunoassay
MAGLUMI 2019-nCoV IgG: all sera/sera 15?days/sera ?15?days
LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG: all sera/sera 15?days/sera ?15?days
Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA: all sera/sera 15?days/sera ?15?days
COVID-19 ELISA IgG: all sera/sera 15?days/sera ?15?days
Positive/positive75/30/4574/29/4575/30/4582/36/46Negative/negative5/3/26/3/36/3/36/3/3Positive/negative8/7/19/8/18/7/11/1/0Negative/positive2/1/11/1/01/1/01/1/0 Open in a separate windows NtAb, neutralizing antibodies A total of 90 sera were included, of which 41 were collected 15?days after the onset of symptoms and 49 afterward (?15?days) The level of sensitivity of NtAb and SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassays Overall, the most sensitive checks were the TZ9 GFP reporter-based pseudotyped computer virus neutralization assay and the COVID-19 ELISA IgG, followed by the MAGLUMI 2019-nCoV IgG, the Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA, and the LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (Table ?(Table4).4). Variations in level of sensitivity were more apparent when sera were collected early after the onset of symptoms (15?days) were analyzed independently, and these tended to decrease in sera obtained at a later time point (Table ?(Table44). Table 4 Clinical level of sensitivity of an antibody neutralization method using a reporter-based pseudotyped computer virus (vesicular stomatitis computer virus pseudotyped with the SARS-CoV-2 TZ9 spike protein) and four commercial SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassays for the analysis of COVID-19
All seraa92.2 (86.7C97.8)84.4 (77.0C91.9)83.3 (75.6C91.0)85.6 (78.3C92.8)92.2 (86.7C97.8)Sera collected 15?days ETV7 after the onset of symptomsa90.2 (77.5C96.1)75.6 (60.7C86.2)73.2 (58.1C84,3)75.6 (60.7C86.2)90.2 (77.5C96.1)Sera collected ?15?days since the onset of symptomsa93.9 (83.5C97.9)91.8 (88.8C96.8)91.8 (88,8C96.8)93.9 (83,5C97.9)93.9 (83.5C97.9) Open in a separate window aA total of 90 sera were included, of which 41 were collected 15?days after the onset of symptoms and 49 afterwards (?15?days) Correlation between NtAb50 titers.